Počátky rajhradského kláštera - monastické, nebo kolegiátní?
The study discusses Libor Jan’s hypothesis that the Rajhrad Monastery was not only founded as an independent institution, but was also a collegiate chapter and not a Benedictine cloister. Jan later declared Rajhrad a significant centre for the 10th century South Moravian church and even the seat of a bishop’s filial office. Although these hypotheses were … celý popis
Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
- Hlavní autor
- Typ dokumentu
- Články
- Publikováno v
- Studia mediaevalia Bohemica. -- ISSN 1804-0977. -- Roč. 8, č. 2 (2016), s. 219-245
- Témata
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000004i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 002325949 | ||
| 003 | CZ PrAS | ||
| 005 | 20190118130144.0 | ||
| 008 | 180921s2016 xr f 000 0 cze d | ||
| 040 | |a ABA007 |b cze |e rda |9 2 | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a cze |b eng | |
| 043 | |a e-xr--- |b e-xr-pg |b e-xr-mr |b e-xr-jm |2 czenas | ||
| 072 | 7 | |a 930 |x Historická věda. Pomocné vědy historické. Archivnictví |2 Konspekt |9 8 | |
| 100 | 1 | |a Zapletalová, Dana |7 mzk2018993056 |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Počátky rajhradského kláštera - monastické, nebo kolegiátní? / |c Dana Zapletalová. |
| 246 | 3 | 1 | |a The foundation of the Rajhrad cloister - monastic or collegiate? |
| 336 | |a text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a bez média |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a svazek |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | 3 | 9 | |a The study discusses Libor Jan’s hypothesis that the Rajhrad Monastery was not only founded as an independent institution, but was also a collegiate chapter and not a Benedictine cloister. Jan later declared Rajhrad a significant centre for the 10th century South Moravian church and even the seat of a bishop’s filial office. Although these hypotheses were insufficiently supported, they began to be accepted in the literature. However, most of the arguments in favour of these ideas can be disproven. The author examines the so-called Pseudo-Břetislav Fakes that include the Břevnov Monestary’s claim to Rajhrad and proves the authenticity of the testimony within. The conflict between the Olomouc bishops and Břevnov is also discussed, presenting the older claims by the Prague institution. The author also analyses immunity and indulgence documents, which do not show the independence of the Rajhrad Monastery. The author also doubts the church tradition lasting from the post-Great Moravia period, which is the basis for Jan’s hypotheses. |9 eng |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a medievalistika |7 ph115254 |2 czenas |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a kláštery |7 ph121648 |2 czenas |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a medievalistics |2 eczenas |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a monasteries |2 eczenas |
| 651 | 7 | |a Břevnov (Praha, Česko) |7 ge137107 |2 czenas | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Morava (Česko) |7 ge130070 |2 czenas | |
| 651 | 7 | |a Rajhrad (Česko) |7 ge130609 |2 czenas | |
| 651 | 9 | |a Břevnov (Prague, Czechia) |2 eczenas | |
| 651 | 9 | |a Moravia (Czechia) |2 eczenas | |
| 651 | 9 | |a Rajhrad Region (Czechia) |2 eczenas | |
| 653 | 0 | |a memorial records |a collegiate chapter |a forgeries | |
| 655 | 7 | |a články |7 fd133976 |2 czenas | |
| 655 | 9 | |a journal articles |2 eczenas | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Studia mediaevalia Bohemica |x 1804-0977 |g Roč. 8, č. 2 (2016), s. 219-245 |q 8:2 |9 2016 | |
| 856 | 4 | 1 | |u https://kramerius.lib.cas.cz/client/handle/uuid:517f401f-1fd8-4d0e-8def-9ab8df5a2b5d |q text/pdf |y Plný text |4 N |
| 910 | |a ABA007 |x 002325949 |k anlplus | ||
| 990 | |a RS | ||
| 998 | |a http://aleph.nkp.cz/F/?func=direct&doc_number=001746345&local_base=ANL | ||